Sammy Meatballs
Sammy Meatballs? Never Heard of Her
<TABLE class=yspwhitebg id=nfl-team-schedule cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR class=ysprow1><TD></TD><TD>at Indianapolis</TD><TD>W 29-13</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>NBC</TD></TR><TR class=ysprow2><TD height=18> 2</TD><TD>Sun, Sep 14</TD><TD>at Carolina</TD><TD>L 17-20</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>FOX</TD></TR><TR class=ysprow1><TD height=18> 3</TD><TD>Sun, Sep 21</TD><TD>Tampa Bay</TD><TD>L 24-27</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>FOX</TD></TR><TR class=ysprow2><TD height=18> 4</TD><TD>Sun, Sep 28</TD><TD>Philadelphia</TD><TD>W 24-20</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>NBC</TD></TR><TR class=ysprow1><TD height=18> 5</TD><TD>Sun, Oct 5</TD><TD>at Detroit</TD><TD>W 34-7</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>FOX</TD></TR><TR class=ysprow2><TD height=18> 6</TD><TD>Sun, Oct 12</TD><TD>at Atlanta</TD><TD>L 20-22</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>FOX</TD></TR><TR class=ysprow1><TD height=18> 7</TD><TD>Sun, Oct 19</TD><TD>Minnesota</TD><TD>W 48-41</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>FOX</TD></TR><TR class=ysprow2><TD height=18> 8</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>bye</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>--</TD></TR><TR class=ysprow1><TD height=18> 9</TD><TD>Sun, Nov 2</TD><TD>Detroit</TD><TD>W 27-23</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>FOX</TD></TR><TR class=ysprow2><TD height=18> 10</TD><TD>Sun, Nov 9</TD><TD>Tennessee</TD><TD>L 14-21</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>CBS</TD></TR><TR class=ysprow1><TD height=18> 11</TD><TD>Sun, Nov 16</TD><TD>at Green Bay</TD><TD>L 3-37</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>FOX</TD></TR><TR class=ysprow2><TD height=18> 12</TD><TD>Sun, Nov 23</TD><TD>at St. Louis</TD><TD>W 27-3</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>FOX</TD></TR><TR class=ysprow1><TD height=18> 13</TD><TD>Sun, Nov 30</TD><TD>at Minnesota</TD><TD>L 14-34</TD><TD>--</TD><TD>NBC</TD></TR><TR class=ysprow2><TD height=18> 14</TD><TD>Sun, Dec 7</TD><TD>Jacksonville</TD><TD>W 23-10</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
I was looking over these stats and have watched Chicago play. I noticed one certain trend that could not be overlooked? Is the Chicago D really good ? How good are they?
What I found is that it is proven that they have allowed the most points in divisional games- Their Defense was really exposed and played their Worst 4 games of the year vs their own Division-
THeir most points given up on D were to 4 games in their Division--
41 Given up to Minnesotta
37 Given up to Green Bay
34 Given up to Minnesota
27 Given up to Tampa BAY
23 Given up to Detroit-
Then they gave up to non Division teams-
10 to Jags
3 to St Louis
13 to Indy
20 To carolina
20 to eagles
22 to Atlanta
21 to Tennesse
This is interesting to me and would suggest that perhaps teams that dont know Chicago dont know how to exploit their weakness vs the PASS???
The divisional games all the Qb's threw for a high number of completions vs the Bears--
Detroit threw for 28 completions vs them- is that even possible?
Tampa had 38 completions vs them-- Griese spread them out--
Aaron Rodgers had 23 nice completions vs them-
Frerotte had 25 completions vs them in Chicago--
The funny thing is they give up more completions at home games also-
It would seem reasonable to me that other teams dont adjust to the Bears weakness here and are not able to exploit them. Perhaps also they dont which linebackers cant cover and which formations the bears cannot stop ie 3 or 4 receiver set, dump off passes--
The key to New Orleans will be if they know the bear D well enough to exploit them right of the bat, they can beat the Bears easily.
Brees road splits are pretty average and he throws int's. He is also not the greatest outdoor cold weather QB- They played a few years back and bears beat them. However if they abandon the run all game pretty much and spread them out, I cannot see Bears having much energy to rush the QB in the 3rd and 4th qtr--
Then another factor is whether the weather will be good for spread attacks and the winds do not affect passing-
So it really depends on the Saints ability to exploit the Bears coverage and force their linebackers into covering Reggie Bush and Campbell and on receivers.
I was looking over these stats and have watched Chicago play. I noticed one certain trend that could not be overlooked? Is the Chicago D really good ? How good are they?
What I found is that it is proven that they have allowed the most points in divisional games- Their Defense was really exposed and played their Worst 4 games of the year vs their own Division-
THeir most points given up on D were to 4 games in their Division--
41 Given up to Minnesotta
37 Given up to Green Bay
34 Given up to Minnesota
27 Given up to Tampa BAY
23 Given up to Detroit-
Then they gave up to non Division teams-
10 to Jags
3 to St Louis
13 to Indy
20 To carolina
20 to eagles
22 to Atlanta
21 to Tennesse
This is interesting to me and would suggest that perhaps teams that dont know Chicago dont know how to exploit their weakness vs the PASS???
The divisional games all the Qb's threw for a high number of completions vs the Bears--
Detroit threw for 28 completions vs them- is that even possible?
Tampa had 38 completions vs them-- Griese spread them out--
Aaron Rodgers had 23 nice completions vs them-
Frerotte had 25 completions vs them in Chicago--
The funny thing is they give up more completions at home games also-
It would seem reasonable to me that other teams dont adjust to the Bears weakness here and are not able to exploit them. Perhaps also they dont which linebackers cant cover and which formations the bears cannot stop ie 3 or 4 receiver set, dump off passes--
The key to New Orleans will be if they know the bear D well enough to exploit them right of the bat, they can beat the Bears easily.
Brees road splits are pretty average and he throws int's. He is also not the greatest outdoor cold weather QB- They played a few years back and bears beat them. However if they abandon the run all game pretty much and spread them out, I cannot see Bears having much energy to rush the QB in the 3rd and 4th qtr--
Then another factor is whether the weather will be good for spread attacks and the winds do not affect passing-
So it really depends on the Saints ability to exploit the Bears coverage and force their linebackers into covering Reggie Bush and Campbell and on receivers.