And again............
- Thread starter Killa
- Start date
I'm blindly betting it myself. I've bet the last 3 and not one of them was even close to losing and I'm betting them until I lose. No thought whatsoever into this play, so I dunno about tailing lol.
I'm just beyond stunned. I honestly hope there is at least one poster, or lurker, on this forum that has followed my plays over the last month and understands the extent of my bad luck. Because no words can describe the incredible bad luck I have endured over the last 4 or 5 weeks.
S
scourge
Guest
Fair question, maybe you didn't tune in to the game today. Tim Duncan got ejected in the 3Q in what was quite honestly the most bizarre set of technical fouls I have seen in 15-some-odd years of watching NBA basketball.
B
Billivy
Guest
are you serious???
keep in mind i usually hate when this kid crys abotu his "bad luck" or "curse"...
but he won a total today by 30...and lost a side by 5 with Avery Johnson lying about playing time for his starters and Duncan (who was dominating the game) ejected early in the second half...San Antonio scored 10 in the 4th...THE ENTIRE GAME WAS GOING THROUGH DUNCAN....
killa made two very correct plays today and lost money...this time i agree with him
D
DJFadeAway
Guest
can u explain what happened dude....i was watchin the yankee game when it happened
Tito
The Salty Dog
I don't understand, lots of people lost with the Spurs today
most are saying how crooked Crawford is - not what incredibly bad luck they have - everyone has tough beats in betting. You always complain about your losses as incredible, god hates you - bad luck - never understood it. Fucking rotten beat, no doubt - and great call on the Under
most are saying how crooked Crawford is - not what incredibly bad luck they have - everyone has tough beats in betting. You always complain about your losses as incredible, god hates you - bad luck - never understood it. Fucking rotten beat, no doubt - and great call on the Under
brewer
Fan Club of any and everyone good!
thats what i like to hear
Well said. I too have never seen a call that bizarre in my life of watching NBA basketball.
Gorgolon Lives
The Reverend of CTG
By rule, the technical was justified.
When you really think about this game there are two crooked things which occured. One was Crawford making the same bogus call twice on the Spurs best player leading to an ejection. The second is how Avery Johnson let it be known that no one would play more than 26 minutes and suddenly they were playing as if this were a playoff game. The oddsmakers opened the game at Dallas -1 and everyone apparently was betting SA for good reason. Then Joey Crawford decided to change the game because he had to.
He probably made himself and someone else a small fortune on two laughing technical fouls on Tim Duncan.
Joe Crawford should be suspended by the NBA for those calls. When I think back to all the calls I've ever questioned in any sport these two take the cake. Phantom pass interference, bizarre penalties, weird strike three calls and managerial moves but nothing and I mean nothing compares to two laughing technical fouls. If Joe Crawford wasn't involved in fixing this game then he is one very insecure man to get riled by a player simply laughing on the bench at maybe his bad refereeing.
He probably made himself and someone else a small fortune on two laughing technical fouls on Tim Duncan.
Joe Crawford should be suspended by the NBA for those calls. When I think back to all the calls I've ever questioned in any sport these two take the cake. Phantom pass interference, bizarre penalties, weird strike three calls and managerial moves but nothing and I mean nothing compares to two laughing technical fouls. If Joe Crawford wasn't involved in fixing this game then he is one very insecure man to get riled by a player simply laughing on the bench at maybe his bad refereeing.
brewer
Fan Club of any and everyone good!
how so? how could he determine from the otherside of the court what duncan was laughing at? he might have hit his funny bone for all crawford knows. never did like him.
Gorgolon Lives
The Reverend of CTG
A technical foul(s) may be assessed to any player on the court or anyone seated on the bench for conduct which, in the opinion of an official, is detrimental to the game.
d. A technical foul shall be assessed for unsportsmanlike tactics such as:
(1) Disrespectfully addressing an official
(2) Physically contacting an official
(3) Overt actions indicating resentment to a call
(4) Use of profanity
(5) A coach entering onto the court without permission of an official
(6) A deliberately-thrown elbow or any attempted physical act with no con-tact involved
(7) Taunting
d. A technical foul shall be assessed for unsportsmanlike tactics such as:
(1) Disrespectfully addressing an official
(2) Physically contacting an official
(3) Overt actions indicating resentment to a call
(4) Use of profanity
(5) A coach entering onto the court without permission of an official
(6) A deliberately-thrown elbow or any attempted physical act with no con-tact involved
(7) Taunting
Gorgolon Lives
The Reverend of CTG
And since Duncan already had 1 technical foul for similar behavior, these actions were considered in a resentful fashion.
Gorgolon Lives
The Reverend of CTG
A technical foul(s) may be assessed to any player on the court or anyone seated on the bench for conduct which, in the opinion of an official, is detrimental to the game.
Gorgolon Lives
The Reverend of CTG
By rule, Crawford was CORRECT in what he did.
Amen.
Gorgolon Lives
The Reverend of CTG
And if the game was fixed, why? So, Spurs could finish in 3rd and play Denver?
The 7 spot is still undecided, so it had nothing to do with Suns getting 2nd.
Whats so intriguing about Spurs/Nuggets? I rather see Suns/Nuggets.
The 7 spot is still undecided, so it had nothing to do with Suns getting 2nd.
Whats so intriguing about Spurs/Nuggets? I rather see Suns/Nuggets.
