2016 US Open...

CollegeKingRex

CTG Regular
In 2007, the last time the U.S. Open was played at Oakmont Country Club just outside of Pittsburgh, there were a total of EIGHT rounds played under par-70 for the week. Angel Cabrera’s winning score of 5-over par was one better than Tiger Woods and Jim Furyk.


The course looks different this time but only because a bunch of trees that bordered the Pennsylvania Turnpike have been leveled. There is an absence of water and trees but Oakmont will look AND play like a links course that the designer envisioned when it opened in 1904. The abundance of sand traps and fast and undulating greens will ensure that scoring is still going to be difficult.


There will be blind tee shots and approaches and greens tilt away from fairways on many holes. The undulations on the green and slick poa annua will result in numerous three-putts this week. I’m looking for players who can avoid the rough, whose length isn’t the most important thing and who have enough mental strength to overcome a bad hole by not turning it into two bad holes.


Fuzzy Zoeller won the Masters in his first attempt in 1979 – that hadn’t been done in the modern era. But no one hears much about Francis Ouimet – he was the last golfer to win the U.S. Open on his first try, in 1913. That is good enough for me to scratch out a good number of the 156 golfers who tee off on Thursday when it comes to my betting odds-to-win. Simply put, draw a line through the virgins.


Without further ado, here’s what I am looking at when trying to make money this week.


To win the tournament:

I am going against each of the world’s top three players. Jason Day, Rory McIlroy and Jordan Spieth have combined to play zero competitive rounds here. Despite winning five of the last seven majors between them, I have zero faith that things will come easier for them this weekend than to others with experience here. And the value is just not there at the world’s best offshore sportsbook, with none of the three fetching more than 9-to-1 at any of my best-funded outs. So that leaves…

Dustin Johnson, 14-to-1. He’s finished in the top 10 in five of the last 10 majors, with a tied-4th and tied-2nd in this event the last two years. He also finished with a 63 on Sunday in Memphis at the TPC Southwind and should have all the confidence in the world after leading late at Chambers Bay last year before a late spit-out. He mauls the ball yet keeps it in the fairway. My top choice, worthy of a 1.0 unit play.

Adam Scott, 33-to-1. I was the first to discard him and all others who were “cheating” by using the belly putter for many years. Yet Scott actually improved once forced to go back to putting naturally, and he has a lot of positives coming in. He keeps it in play and caddy Steve Williams had Tiger’s bag in 2007 and knows the course. Another top choice, and also worthy of 1.0 units.

Sergio Garcia, 45-to-1. Is in any discussion for best player to have never won a major, but he’s made 14 of 16 cuts in this event primarily because he keeps the ball in play and leads the tour in greens-in-regulation. Putting is a concern but it will be difficult for everyone here this week. His last US Open missed cut came here in 2007, which inflates the price. Worth a 0.5 unit play.

Louis Oosthuizen, 66-to-1. His current form is suspect, but there is a lot to like here. He also was struggling entering the 2015 US Open yet closed with 66-66-67 to tie for second behind Spieth. He has made the cut in his last nine majors and hits it straight. He also won the British Open on a daunting links track by a mile and has also been a runner-up in that event. Playing with Day and Scott could bring out the best in the South African. Also for 0.5 units.

J.B. Holmes, 80-to-1. He was the medalist here in the 2003 U.S. Amateur on the heels of a 70 at Oakmont. This is his first Open here, but he tied for fourth at the Memorial last out and could contend. This is for 0.25 units to win 20.

Gregory Bourdy, 400-to-1. I’m not sure what to make of a guy who fires his longtime caddy after finishes in the top 15 or better in each of his last three events but this is a guy worth a look at an outlandish price, regardless of who’s on the bag. Just 0.2 units here to win 80.

Matchups:


These are the ones that I went biggest on. I have six or eight others for less than 1 unit just to have something to sweat and prove that the 20 hours or so of work I did on this event are compensated with some beer money when it’s all said and done.

7014 Mickelson vs. Rose – This is a Rose fade, as I try to bet against injured players. Rose has had a balky back that has kept him on the sidelines since the Players Championship. Phil usually competes but spraying the ball all over the yard gives him no chances to show off his recovery skills. Still, at even money or better (I got +105), it is worth 1.5 units.

7029 Scott vs. Watson – I get to fade Bubba AND bet on Scott, so this is my favorite investment. Bubba has not finished better than tie-32 in the last five years and is only priced this way thanks to a tie-5th at this venue in 2007. He loathes this setup because he can’t bomb away and be erratic because of the unforgiving rough. An easy lay at -120 for 2.5 units, my biggest play.

7055 Oosthuizen vs. Schwartzel – I like Oostie to contend to win, and am bearish on his countryman. Schwartzel missed the cut at the Masters but has played better of late. Still, value lies with the British Open winner. Take even money if you can’t do better than my +105 for 1 unit.

7072 Grillo vs. Lee – Not betting Grillo to win the event; this is his first US Open. But think he can win this matchup based on making nine of the 10 last cuts, competitive at the Memorial and strikes the ball well enough to hover on the leaderboard. I took +115 for 1.5 units.

7096 Streelman vs. Kizzire – Not fond of the latter, and Streelman bagged another top-10 two weeks back when tying for 8th at the Memorial. Taking even money there for 1.2 units seemed like I was getting the best of it.

7079-80 Haas vs. Kirk – No play here, but it goes to show just how much these matchmakers know about this stuff. I had penciled in plays AGAINST BOTH GUYS this week, only to horrifyingly find them matched up together. All I could do was laugh. Check Chris Kirk’s twitter account exactly one year ago and two years ago for why I wanted to go against him – it’s worth the time to find him badmouthing the USGA last year. Haas has missed more cuts than he’s made in this event and has not finished better than tie-43rd in any of these lesser Tour events the last month.

Might add some more later, GL...

:shake:
 
Some great tidbits here...

Phils comments other day were interesting...

GL this week Rexy
 
Also with the rain that is forecasted may not play as fast as anticipated either.

Scores should be lower as well, might see some darts being thrown and putts won't be as tough. Kinda sucks tbh
 
More notes:

One of the things that makes the U.S. Open so difficult to wager on most years is that the USGA is in charge of setting up the course how they see fit. Their goal is to make the course as tough and fair as possible.


The major innovations in technology have helped, but courses built more than 100 years ago have simply been unable to keep up with bigger, stronger players who don’t play golf for a hobby, but rather for a living. So the USGA does everything it can to keep the scoring at something as close to par as they can.

For Oakmont Country Club, however, none of that is necessary.

Very few changes are needed even to a course that opened in 1904 just east of Pittsburgh. Designer H.C. Fownes never designed another course. Yet few would argue that there is a harder golf course in America than this one, tucked just south of the Allegheny River and split in the middle by Interstate 76.

The tournament setup was botched rather poorly last year when it was held in the Pacific Northwest for the first time at Chambers Bay in Oregon last summer. Of course, the weather is the x-factor when trying to setup the course properly and walking the line between too easy and cruelly hard.

This will be a record ninth time that the U.S. Open has been played at Oakmont, which opened as a par-80. The pristine greens will roll to a 14.5 or so on the stimpmeter as some of the fastest yet fair in the world.

The wind was blowing Sunday, making some of the practice round shots that were making the rounds on Instagram and Twitter nothing but laughable. The wind should die down and there is a chance of rain on Thursday and Friday which could soften the course up some and make the greens more receptive. The flip side to a wet track would mean advancing the ball out of the rough would be fruitless. Hit it in the rough, and the mindset must immediately change to bogey the hole.

If you are in exclusive company and are able to access the iconic Oakmont clubhouse veranda behind the 9[SUP]th[/SUP] holegreen, you will be able to see every hole (2-8) on the other side of the Pennsylvania Turnpike. About 7,000 trees were removed from the course before the last U.S. Open there in 2007 and another 15,000 more were removed (though none of them affected play) before this one – this restores the course back to its original links origin and improves the panoramas around the course.

So how does a course without water and trees play as one of the toughest in the world? There is an unforgiving and penalizing rough. And then there are 210 bunkers – an average of 12 per hole. Contrast that with the Old Course at St. Andrews, where there are 112 sand traps, almost twice as few as at Oakmont. The key for anyone trying to contend this week will be to keep the ball on the short stuff off the tee, though that could be said many times each year when previewing a PGA event.

Oakmont doesn’t play extraordinarily long at 7,255 from the tips, but there are some monster holes for a par-70 layout. The par-3 8[SUP]th[/SUP] is the longest par-3 in US Open history and can be extended to 300 yards. The 12[SUP]th[/SUP] is a 677-yard par-5 that boasts five greenside bunkers and a sixth that is just short of the green.

It will be interesting to see who will emerge as champion in the field of 156. None of the world’s top three between Jordan Spieth, Jason Day or Rory McIlroy have ever played the course in a competitive round but they’ve won five of the last seven majors. It is worth noting that the USGA paired the last two Oakmont winners together with local favorite Jim Furyk, the 2003 US Open champion. The 2007 champ Angel Cabrera and 1993 winner Ernie Els will play with Furyk for the first two rounds.
 
I think the rough takes away creativity and skill. Dont think Phil has an advantage around the greens. It's hack and hope.
 
Havent done much research but I was looking at poor putters and Oostie seemed to be on the top of that list. I think there will be a lot of 5 to 10 footers for par. Doesnt look like any body will be hitting shots close.
 
Took flyers on Kaymer, Dufner, McGirt and Na

Zero reason for why I picked Kaymer
Dufner played well here in 2007
McGirt is pure homer play
Na been playing well and 250-1 seemed silly
 
I have a feeing Dj wins it as well. I think Fowler puts in a strong effort. Really just looking at guys that are great off the tee and decent short games.
 
BOL CKR/


i'll be volunteering in the Trophy Tent today if anybody is there...
 
In a long time betting arrangement I have with two old friends, we each pick eleven man teams in a NF L type draft. Money is won in a variety of ways, including head to head match ups.
Rex I hope you have a winner. My first Nouri pix were D J, Scott, and Stenson, and Sergio. I had no shot at Day or Spieth because I drafted third (I was the winner in 2015 ). Would have taken Day, passed on McIlroy, and would have passed on Spieth.
good luck, CT R.
 
Thanks fellas. Looks like I'll have a sweat for my money this weekend, as I've got three of the top four with just a few holes of 2R play left.

Will see if any interesting third round matchups pop up
 
Good luck the rest of the way....loved your take on the entire tourney

i have a weird gut feel that oooost brings it home Sunday
 
7302 Spieth +110 vs Day for 1u
7321 Dechambeau even vs Steele for 1.2u
7332 Westwood -145 vs. Summerhays for 1.5u
7335 Lowry -120 vs. Sullivan for 1.5u
7338 Bourdy -105 vs. Piercy for 2u
7340 Garcia +115 vs DJ for 1.2u


GL, I get 29 hours to sweat my five guys in the top 15, but Bourdy's finish wasn't very promising. Enjoy!
 
Real interesting seeing the 3 biggest names on the leaderboard are three of the biggest bridesmaids in major golf history.
 
GL on Thomas

Wanted to fade DeChambeau and bet on Day today and voila, they get paired with each other and I lay -210 for a healthy amount, so obviously health on that one...pulling for your 14-1 to win the damn thing even though I'm against him in round 4.
 
Haven't seen a ton of coverage but I've seen enough to realize fox has improved a lot.

Bryson is a stud. Should lock up his tour card here.
 
Well yeah, not like it coulda gone downhill but pleasantly surprised at how much better it's been
 
I think the course they're playing on helps the coverage a lot. Chambers Bay was just too goofy.
 
Yeah but greg norman was awful and holly sonders basically got fired from her player interviewer duties two days into the tournament for obvious reasons. Like my buddy said, she missed the cut.

That said her role this year seems to fit her well.
 
You're right I forgot Norman was on last year's broadcast. Zinger and Strange a lot more seasoned. I could watch Holly Sonders talking to a fence post. Never really cared what the players have to say.
 
You're right I forgot Norman was on last year's broadcast. Zinger and Strange a lot more seasoned. I could watch Holly Sonders talking to a fence post. Never really cared what the players have to say.

That was my point, her questions were awful and the players were just staring at her tits the whole time anyway...borderline painful as an interviewer but naturally we just stared as well. She seems to do well at this gig.
 
The people in the gallery have often been more accurate and better commentary than Fox although I'm giving Zinger a pass because he's pretty good...Strange, meh
 
Have always thought if the ball moves directly toward the putter it's on the man...and again I think that rule blows. Just replace it and go
 
It's probably going to be up to him, but he soled the putter next to it, not behind it that it looks like. Stupid fucking rule.
 
Would be nice if someone hit some shots and actual grabbed this trophy. It's been terrible approach after terrible approach. 14 and 15 were very accessible pins.
 
Back
Top