2013-14 NHL Thoughts & Bets

BetCrimes1984

CTG Big Brother
Chicago currently has a 7 game 5-goals-or-less streak going . To put this into context, the following stats (of completed streaks) are from the 05-06 season onwards (since the rule changes) -


5 goals or less game streaks

Streak length ... No. of streaks
5 games ........... 168
6 games ........... 104
7 games ............ 60
8 games ............ 27
9 games ............ 19
10 games .......... 10
11 games ............ 2
12 games ............ 5
13 games ............ 1
14 games ............ 2
15 games ............ 0
16 games ............ 1

From these stats it's found that 89.97% of the streaks that reached 5 games in length ended before reaching 9 games in length: just 1 in 10. It's these historical stats which set the scene for my chasing the Over through the Hawks next 2 games, but they're hardly the only pointer to this Hawks run of low scoring games coming to an end -

(1) Nashville (streak's 8th game) has scored at least 3 regulation goals in 9 of their last 11 games in Chicago (avg. 3.27 reg. goals for). Of Chicago's 7 wins in these games, 5 (71.4%) totaled at least 6 goals. Nashville more generally is 7-2-2 to Over their L11 away (avg. 3.18 reg. goals against).

(2) Dallas (streak's 9th game) & Chicago have managed to total at least 6 goals in 8 of their last 9 meetings in Chicago (the exceptional result saw Chicago total only 1 goal in losing), with Dallas scoring a minimum of 2 regulation goals in every one of those games. Dallas more generally is 4-1 to Over their L5 away (avg. 4.40 reg. goals against).

(3) Chicago's longest streak of home games totalling 5 goals or less this season sits at 5: their current streak of 7 games includes 4 home games, so for them to play out their next 2 games without at least one totalling at least 6 goals would be to manage something they haven't been able to do over 32 previous home games. You have to go back to the 09-10 season to find a Chicago 5-goal or less streak longer than 5 home games.

(4) Chicago has played 13 straight games without a losing team scoring 3+ goals. In their previous 58 games, they averaged one 3+ goal loser every 3.6 games played, with their previous longest streak of no 3+ goal loser being just 8 games. In short, the Hawks are "due" (by their own season long standards) to play in a shoot-out type of game.

-----

The usual & obvious standard for my playing an Over is the expectation that both teams will contribute to the scoring, and both Chicago's coming opponents provide stats which emphatically speak to their likely doing so on Chicago's home ice.

Game #1: Chc/Nas Over 5.5 (+100)

 
In New Zealand, johnny, not Oz.

------

Couple of further statistical pointers towards the Over for Chicago's game vs. Dallas.

(1) Crawford held Nashville to 2 goals, meaning he has now gone 5 straight starts without conceding 3 reg. goals or more. This season he has conceded an avg. of 4.50 reg. goals off having conceded 2 reg. goals or less over his previous 5 starts, and has conceded an avg. of 3.25 reg. goals off having conceded 2 reg. goals or less over his previous 4 starts.

(2) Dallas has held their last 2 opponents to 1 goal. This season playing off having held their opponents to 1 goal or less over their previous 2 games, Dallas has conceded 5, 0, 4, 1 & 4 reg. goals in their next game. Either very good or very poor, nothing inbetween. And here Chicago is off a home shutout loss, making it difficult to envisage the Hawks being offensively poor.

(3) Since Dallas is playing their 2nd of a b2b, chances are good their 2nd string goalie - Thomas - will be in net. He's conceded an avg. of 3.20 reg. gpg in his appearances for Dallas so far.


Game #2: Chc/Dal Over 5.5 (-105)
 
Thanks, boys. Thought the Over was raped by that BS high stick on that disallowed EN goal. Justice was served in the end.
 
@BC: Have you got the 6 goals or more game streaks going from 05-06 season? Thanks if it doesn't take you too much time. I usually like to chase against an over streak of 3-4 games with other factors
 
Since the rule changes leading into the 05-06 season...


6+ goal game streaks

streak length ... No. of streaks
5 games ........... 119
6 games ........... 56
7 games ........... 30
8 games ........... 15
9 games ........... 11
10 games .......... 3
11 games .......... 3

That's until March 13th last year, edou1x, so naturally it's in need of updating.
 
There's been 17 Western Conf playoff games, and only 2 road winners: none in regulation. Also, the Fav count currently runs at 26-9 for the playoffs overall (Pitt 2-1 Cob pending, so basically 27-9 = 75%). I think we've got the situation where it's time to look at betting with statistical expectations for both Fav & Western home team biases to "ease". I don't see/expect LA beating SJ (not impossible obv., but), so that leaves MIN@COL & ANA@DAL as Dogs/Western roadies that I see fitting the bill.

Why is Minny worth a look? They lost their first 2 games @COL mainly because Bryz licked balls in net. Kuemper came in for his first game time in a month in the latter stages of game 2, and ever since then Minny's D has been a brick wall. His entry into the series has been the tipping point for the Wild's fortunes, only it coincides with the change of venues so someone not paying attention is only going to assume their turnaround is due to that. No doubt it helped, but COL has gone from scoring 8 regulation goals in their first 5 reg. periods, to scoring 2 reg goals (1 an empy netter) over their last 7 reg. periods. A venue change simply doesn't explain this level of fall off. Kuemper's introduction and the Av's losing Barrie are the more pertinent realities that form the basis for expecting the Wild to be able to deliver here.

Small bet on Minny ml (+115)
 
Back
Top