Wiretowire
Pretty much a regular
So there is a lot of talk about this as to why so many this year. This is the reason that I call these guys Tulips and sissies. Throughout their pro career they are held to certain pitch counts or innings. They are not in the physical shape necessary to handle the stress. What stress? How about they are on pitch counts like 100 which for some reason is the magic number today in MLB. Then they do a great job and have a no hitter, 1 hitter, or just a big lead and the coach leaves them in for the extra inning or 20 pitches or whatever. Really tears them up when they have a good game going and they are really pressing to continue it but they are beyond their normal thresholds.
Funny, in the old days, yes there were pitchers that had to quit because of arm problems but a helluva lot fewer, they really were war horses compared to todays pitchers. They didn't have pitch counts. But today they are going fewer and fewer innings. In 10 years they will probably have to change the criteria for a pitcher to be named a winner. Now it's complete 5 innings with the lead but the average a pitcher seems to throw is now only around 6 innings. Keep specializing and refining and it wouldn't be out of the question to see in future years a guy starts and goes 4 innings then another guy goes 3 then another 1 and the last 1 inning. Kind of have that now with the starter at 6 and the setup at 2 with the closer the last. There wasn't a setup guy way back when. There was a starter and closer. The only time you sent another guy in before the 9th was to take over for a starter that got bombed. The skipper would hand the guy the ball and say "Go throw strikes and give me 4 or whatever innings to finish the game." Didn't matter how many pitches he had to throw he just had to finish so they didn't waste relievers. Everyone on the team knew the guys role was just to eat innings and it didn't matter how many runs scored against him. The team and the coaches all gave him a hero welcome when the game was over. The closers and other relievers would buy him dinner and beer.
No, I don't think this is the only reason but it has to be a contributing factor. But that's just my opinion. Thoughts? GL
Funny, in the old days, yes there were pitchers that had to quit because of arm problems but a helluva lot fewer, they really were war horses compared to todays pitchers. They didn't have pitch counts. But today they are going fewer and fewer innings. In 10 years they will probably have to change the criteria for a pitcher to be named a winner. Now it's complete 5 innings with the lead but the average a pitcher seems to throw is now only around 6 innings. Keep specializing and refining and it wouldn't be out of the question to see in future years a guy starts and goes 4 innings then another guy goes 3 then another 1 and the last 1 inning. Kind of have that now with the starter at 6 and the setup at 2 with the closer the last. There wasn't a setup guy way back when. There was a starter and closer. The only time you sent another guy in before the 9th was to take over for a starter that got bombed. The skipper would hand the guy the ball and say "Go throw strikes and give me 4 or whatever innings to finish the game." Didn't matter how many pitches he had to throw he just had to finish so they didn't waste relievers. Everyone on the team knew the guys role was just to eat innings and it didn't matter how many runs scored against him. The team and the coaches all gave him a hero welcome when the game was over. The closers and other relievers would buy him dinner and beer.
No, I don't think this is the only reason but it has to be a contributing factor. But that's just my opinion. Thoughts? GL