The magazine is just as great as it always is--best in the business--but he did a strange thing this year.
Because the NCAA granted a blanket ruling of an extra year of eligibility for all athletes competing in a fall sport Phil lists all players as being in the same class they were last year. So a guy who started every game last year as a freshman is still listed as a freshman.
It's not the way I would have done it because we know from the guys who were seniors last year that only a small number chose to return and play an extra year, so why treat every single player on the roster as if they will automatically play an extra year
So it's annoying, but still a minor quibble. The overall information is still the best
Yea man. Still adjusting to the pulling em on and offGot my first last January at -1.25 which made a huge difference til I had to go up to -1.75 a couple weeks later, man those eyes must have been screaming for help for quite awhile